So, mere hours after Bill "Horatio Sanz" Richardson endorsed Barack Obama for the Presidency, the Clinton campaign was saying - like always! - that the endorsement wasn't important and that it was "too late." Then, days later, Clinton surrogate compared Richardson to Judas! But which is it? Is he Judas, or is he unimportant? Because I recall that Judas' endorsement was, ultimately, very important! And is Hillary Clinton the "Christ" figure in this equation? Because that's a little beyond the pale. Of course, Judas' betrayal paved the way for Christ's resurrection...so shouldn't Carville be glad Richardson endorsed Obama? Argh. Given a million billion years, I don't think I'll ever understand this.